There's no doubt Higher Ed will need money to keep paying the chancellor's $400,379 annual compensation. But beyond that, your colleague Jason Murphey seems to be making a pretty good case that Higher Ed should actually require lower (not higher) appropriations in years ahead: http://www.seethruedu.com/updates/prescient-lawmaker-challenges-higher-ed-groupthink
There's no doubt Higher Ed will need money to keep paying the chancellor's $400,379 annual compensation. But beyond that, your colleague Jason Murphey seems to be making a pretty good case that Higher Ed should actually require lower (not higher) appropriations in years ahead: http://www.seethruedu.com/updates/prescient-lawmaker-challenges-higher-ed-groupthink
ReplyDelete